Can your AI agent be tricked into draining your wallet?
Once an AI agent can spend on its own, it can be exploited on its own: a single prompt injection can make it pay an attacker. The agent's own ‘judgment’ isn't a defense — it can be poisoned. The real defense is a firewall the agent can't override, enforced before settlement. Attack it yourself below.
1,000 USDC
Hit a button below and watch what happens when your AI agent is attacked.
How it holds
OceanAlt inserts 11 gates between the agent and settlement. All must pass or the payment dies. Hijacked agent changed the payee? Allowlist. Coaxed over the limit? Limit. Draining slowly via small payments? Velocity. Impersonating someone else's agent? Identity proof. Intent tampered? Mandate. Replaying a signed authorization? Replay guard. This is the enforcement core of the Responsible Agentic Payments framework — and three of those gates exist because we broke our own firewall in the Attack Lab and had to patch it.
- Attribution (KYA)
- Revocation check
- Identity proof (anti-impersonation)
- KYC gate (optional)
- Per-payment limit
- Daily cumulative limit
- Payee allowlist
- Mandate-intent match (anti prompt-injection)
- AML sanctions & risk screening
- Behavioral anomaly detection (optional)
- Replay & double-spend prevention
Want this firewall on your agent?
If you're building agents that spend autonomously (payments, subscriptions, trading, procurement), we're looking for a few early design partners. Leave your contact and let's talk.

