Only 23% of Merchants Can Identify AI Agent-Driven Purchases, Attribution Becomes New Competitive Battleground
A new report finds most merchants see AI agents reshaping shopping, yet few can track their impact on sales—creating an early advantage for those that crack attribution.

According to the Global Digital Shopping Index: Merchant Edition report, compiled by PYMNTS Intelligence for Visa Acceptance Solutions, only 23% of merchants can clearly identify traffic and purchases driven by AI agents. Another 21% can recognize agent traffic but cannot link it to completed purchases. The report notes that 27% of large merchants can explicitly identify agent-driven purchases, compared to 19% of small and medium-sized businesses.
The survey shows that most merchants believe AI agents are already intervening in the shopping process: 61% of respondents think AI-generated results will influence purchase decisions more than traditional search, 58% expect agents to select payment methods based on fees and rewards, and 56% anticipate agents will complete transactions autonomously. The report argues that agents may engage at multiple points in the transaction without necessarily finalizing the purchase, complicating attribution. Merchants need reporting systems that connect agent interactions to purchase outcomes, positioning attribution capability as a key early competitive advantage in agentic commerce.
Provenance & status
- Byline
- OceanAlt Editorial
- First published
- 2026-09-03
- Last updated
- 2026-09-03
- Content type
- Newsflash
- Source material
- View original ↗
Related reading

Visa and Mastercard Join Ant International on a KYA Interoperability Framework as Agent Identity Standards Begin to Converge

Félix Raises $200M Led by a16z: Stablecoin Infrastructure Shifts from Remittances to Agent Economy Settlement
U.S. Congress Holds First Hearing on AI Agent Payment Rules: Authorization, Settlement, and Identity Take Center Stage
Paste a payee address before you pay and see whether it's on a sanctions list, through a mixer, or tagged for fraud.
This judgement can sit inside your own product
One line of code; it touches neither your CSS nor your JS. The same pre-settlement judgement can appear in your articles, on your wallet's confirmation screen, or as an endpoint your agent calls before it pays.

